Showing posts with label Dawn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dawn. Show all posts

Tractor trolley calling FM a joker

Take a look at @irfansunny80's Tweet: https://twitter.com/irfansunny80/status/741557009326219264?s=09

Imran and his team were ‘junkies.’

Pakistan cricket: great rivalries and bust ups


The evolution of Pakistan cricket teams has triggered a rather queer phenomenon: the notorious squabbling within the Pakistan team has turned itself into the kind of personal rivalries between players that have actually helped them perform in the most stunning manner (both in victory and defeat). It is as if to perform at their best, Pakistani cricketers have had to challenge each another first.
Each time Pakistan plays, the question is, will they swallow the opposition, or combust into flames?
Late Wasim Raja – elder brother of Rameez Raja – was perhaps the most enigmatic cricketer of the 1970s and early 1980s.
In his book, ‘An All-Round View,’ Imran Khan describes Raja to be one of most gifted stroke makers he had ever seen, but someone who never thought he needed any practice - a carefree trait that did not go down well with Raja’s captains. They all described him as a loner who could not bond well with the team.
Raja bloomed under Muhstaq Muhammad’s captaincy, but not without incidence. Dropped from the team (for being irresponsible) during the 1976 home series against New Zealand, Raja was picked (on skipper Mushtaq’s insistence) in the 18-member squad that toured Australia and West indies during the 1976-77 season.
Pakistan drew the series 1-1 against the Aussies, but Raja did not figure in the final IX, despite scoring a hard-hitting century in a side game. Expecting to be picked for the third test, he was ignored.
In his autobiography, ‘Inside Out,’ Mushtaq writes that he was tempted to select Raja, but since Pakistan were 1-0 down in the series, he wanted a more responsible batsman in the side. Then Mushtaq goes on to describe how badly Raja took the decision.
Raja, in a ‘drunken rage,’ smashed a mirror to bits in his hotel room, and then stumbled across the hotel lobby, accusing the team manager, Shujauddin, of favouritism.
Raja was finally selected (in place of an injured Zaheer) on the West Indian leg of the tour. In a closely fought contest, Pakistan went down 2-1, and ironically, Raja topped the batting averages, scoring more than 500 runs in five tests, with a century and five fifties.
Famous West Indian commentator, Tony Cozier, described Raja’s batting on that tour as ‘breathtaking.’
A future Pakistani Test player, who was then a young member of the touring squad, remembered Raja’s batting (and antics) fondly: ‘He was a law unto himself,’ he told this writer in 1997. ‘Five down for 130 odd, and Raja would come in and hit Joel Garner for a straight six, first ball.’
He also affectionately remembered how Raja, while waiting for his turn to bat (during the second Test on the same tour), slipped out, bumped into a few West Indian fans of his outside the stadium, gleefully shared with them a smoking pipe brimming with  ganja, came back, padded up and went on to score a most prodigious fifty!
Javed Miandad in his book, A Cutting Edge, described Raja as one of the hardest-hitting batsmen. But he also thought Raja was his own greatest enemy.
After having a great tour of India in 1979, (where during one side game in Amritsar, he mischievously threaten to grab the groin of an approaching fan), Raja once again became a frustrating in-out case, finally bidding farewell to cricket in 1985.
Sadly, he died at the age of 55 in 2004.
_______________________________
Whenever there is talk of great Pakistani cricket captains, three names spontaneously spring to mind: Imran Khan, A H. Kardar and Mushtaq Muhammad.
It was under Mushtaq that a bunch of individualistic talents became a world-beating side. With Mushtaq at the helm, Pakistan managed to beat New Zealand and India, as well the 1970s’ mighty Australian and West Indian sides.
Highly competitive, Mushtaq is also remembered as the captain who had a habit of taking struggling players to hotel bars and discussing their form over a glass of beer. It was also under him that Pakistanis attempted to match the Aussies’ knack for ‘effective sledging,’ and he turned Miandad and Sarfraz Nawaz into sledging machines!
It was Mushtaq’s good luck that his long-time vice-captain, Asif Iqbal, was also one of his best friends. But as Mushtaq explains in his autobiography, after captaining Pakistan for four years (1976-79), he was suddenly replaced due to ‘Asif’s intrigues. He blamed Asif (and Majid Khan) for ‘stabbing him in the back,’ by telling the selectors that he was ‘over the hill.’
Mushtaq was all set to continue as skipper for the 1979 series against India, when he was asked to retire by the selectors. Asif became the new captain, leading Pakistan across the turbulent series that Pakistan lost, 2-0.
Humiliated, Asif decided to retire after the disastrous tour, and Mushtaq was asked to return as captain. He declined, and instead suggested the board make Miandad the new captain, and which it did (in 1980).
________________________________
Along with the Wasim-Waqar bowling pair, the Imran-Sarfraz bowling duo is considered to be the best Pakistan cricket has produced.
But unlike Wasim and Waqar, Sarfraz and Imran were also considered to be bosom buddies, and on tours the dashing, ‘playboy’ Imran, and the hard-drinking and boisterous Sarfraz were a regular feature at assorted night clubs. It is said that it was Sarfraz who taught the art of reverse swing to Imran.
The long friendship lasted till 1994 – until Imran Khan began planning to join politics, and refused to welcome the then Prime Minister, Benazir Bhutto, when she made a trip to his charity hospital. A long-time supporter of Bhutto’s Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), Sarfraz had joined the party in 1988.
But what really broke the camel’s back for Nawaz was when Imran (after going through his post-retirement born-again-Muslim routine), started using populist Islamic symbolism and rhetoric. Nawaz went public with his outrage, calling Imran ‘a hypocrite’, saying that a former ‘playboy’ had no right to preach morals. Imran retaliated by calling Nawaz a ‘mad man’ and aghoonda (scoundrel).
The severe brick baiting between the two has continued unabated.
____________________________________
Miandad and Imran are perhaps the two most popular set of cricketers produced by Pakistan. Both served the team together for almost 20 years.
According to a 1996 interview of former Pakistan opener, Mudassar Nazar, Imran and Javed had a ‘classic love-hate relationship’ - a fact that becomes obvious when their assessment of this relationship in their respective autobiographies starts reading like a soggy soap opera! Within a space of a single chapter, Imran in his book, ‘Imran,’ both praises and criticizes Miandad in equal measure. Miandad does the same in his own book, and string after string of sentences showering liberal praise as well as attacks on one another.
Both became friends while playing for Somerset in England in the mid-1970s, where they also shared a flat. However, the friendship began to fall apart after a 23-year-old Miandad replaced Asif Iqbal as captain in 1980.
In 1981, ten players revolted against Miandad’s captaincy and refused to play under him. Miandad blamed Majid Khan and Zaheer Abbas as being the ‘ring leaders’ of the revolt. In his book Miandad suggests that the revolt only became successful when the ‘ring leaders’ convinced Imran to join them. Miandad felt ‘like being stabbed in the back.’
Interestingly, after Miandad stepped down, he told the board that he will not play under either Majid or Zaheer, but will be more than glad to play under Imran. In 1986, Miandad became Imran’s vice-captain.
Some of the most successful ODI and Test cricket by Pakistan was played through the Imran-Miandad ‘think tank,’ an example of which was seen during the fourth Test against England (in England) in 1987.
In an attempt to halt England’s run chase, one side of the wicket was marshaled by captain Imran, while the other side was being maneuvered by his vice-captain, Miandad. The game was saved and Pakistan won the series.
The re-established friendship between the two broke down again when (after Imran’s retirement in 1992), Miandad (as captain) accused Imran of trying to divide the team and get the board to make Wasim Akram captain.
Imran denied the accusation, but in 1993, Miandad stepped down and Akram did become the new skipper.
Miandad retired from cricket in 1996, and has since rekindled his friendship with Imran.
____________________________
Imran Khan vs. Qasim Umar/Yunus Ahmed
Qasim Umar was a dashing young talent who emerged on the scene in the early 1980s. However, by 1988 he was out, banned by the cricket board.
After a 1986 Australian tour, Umar stunned the media by declaring that Imran and his team were ‘junkies.’ He claimed that most of the players (including Imran) smoked cannabis (hashish) and were involved in prostitution. Umar’s timing couldn’t have been worse. The Pakistan team was on a high (pun not intended), and popularly being led by Imran and his vice-captain, Miandad.
In 1987, after an Indian tour, Yunus Ahmed - who’d been brought out of retirement (by Imran) to play against India - repeated Umar’s accusations, claiming that Imran and his team were ‘drunkards’ and smoked dope.
Ahmed, was banned as well.
Qasim Umar today is a member of the Tableeghi Jamat (Islamic evangelists).
______________________
Wasim vs. Waqar
Easily one of the most destructive fast bowling pairs to grace international cricket, Wasim Akram and Waqar Younus were never buddies. According to their own admission, each tried to outdo the other, but of course, it was the team that benefited from this intense rivalry.
Ironically, it was Akram and Waqar who (supposedly on Imran’s instigation), rebelled against Miandad’s captaincy in 1993. Consequently, Akram was named captain, and Waqar became vice-captain.
But the arrangement did not last long. Akram, after being arrested along with a few other Pakistani players, for smoking dope on a Caribbean beach, was disgraced, and Waqar eventually led a players’ revolt against him in 1994.
Akram returned as skipper twice (1996; 1998-99), but his relationship with Waqar remained strained, until both finally reconciled during Waqar’s captaincy (2001-2002).
____________________________
Inzamam-ul Haq is ranked up there with greats like Miandad and rightly so. But in spite of captaining Pakistan for three years (2004-2007), he was constantly criticised for being ‘lethargic’ and too defensive.
Some of his critics also point at his born-again religiosity in which he tried to unite the team on the basis of a particular brand of evangelical Islam (tableeghi).
He regularly allowed certain celebrity-turned-preachers into the dressing room. As he went about changing the team’s culture – blaming alcohol, partying and drugs as the main culprits of the team’s problems – he failed on two major counts.
First of all he alienated some players who did not agree with his brand of religion (mainly Abdul Razzaq, Yunus Khan and Shoaib Akhtar); secondly, the ‘Islamisation’ of the team did absolutely nothing to curb the kind of reckless greed that has seen many players fall pray to shady bookies.
Maverick tear-away fast bowler, Shoaib Akhtar, became the most prominent victim of Inzi’s religious dabbling. A throwback of the ‘wild’ Pakistani cricketers of yore, Shoaib constantly squabbled with Inzamam, calling him a hypocrite for dragging religion into sport.
According to cricket journalist, Osman Sammiuddin, Shoaib sometimes openly rebelled against and mocked Inzi’s ‘Raiwind regime.’ Shoaib refused to give up his love of late night partying, saying that it was his personal matter. Then, during a series against England (in 2005), he kept calling Inzamam in the middle of the night, sarcastically asking him to get ready for prayers!
Shoaib remained an outsider in Inzimam’s team, and the tableeghis who became a regular fixture in the dressing room, avoided him like the plague.
‘They found him to be mocking and rude, and stayed clear of him,’ Osman said.
Shoaib lamented that had he been playing under Imran, he would have achieved a lot more as a bowler. Instead, alienated by Inzi and the team’s overt religious fervor, Shoaib stumbled from one controversy to another.

IK team was a bunh of junkies

Take a look at @bilalaslem's Tweet: https://twitter.com/bilalaslem/status/731565653489033217?s=09

Niazi Company limited

How PTI failed women

http://www.dawn.com/news/1257678/how-pti-failed-women

Take a look at @dawn_com's Tweet: https://twitter.com/dawn_com/status/731067958403973120?s=09

Abbotabad jirga orders putting a girl on fire..

Pakistan’s Hidden Shame: Documentary reveals horrors of pedophilia in K-P

-Publicity image
-Publicity image
Director Mohammed Naqvi,and British producer Jamie Doran's film Pakistan’s Hidden Shame depicts the shocking reality of sexual abuse faced by small boys in the Northern areas of Pakistan.
The documentary premiered on September 1 on Britain's Channel 4 and shows the "dark reality of a society living in denial."
Set mainly in Peshawar, the film shows homeless boys of different ages recalling their experiences of sexual exploitation.
In an interview with CNN journalist Christiane Amanpour, the director of the documentary told her what puts children at risk in Pakistan and around the world.
"Pedophiles by their very nature are inadequate, it's about power over children."
"Where these individuals are able to use and abuse vulnerable children, Pakistan in particular because of the poverty. That's one of the other factors that really plays here."
 Screengrab from the documentary
Screengrab from the documentary
In the documentary, the narrator introduces Pakistan as 'one of the most important Muslim populations, a democracy, a nuclear power and a supporter of the Western bloc.' But it soon reveals the silence and denial on one of the most taboo topics: pedophilia.
The documentary alleges that 9 out of 10 children in Peshawar have been victims of pedophilia. It also contains interviews with truck drivers who have committed such crimes.
Shockingly, one of the drivers admits, without any remorse, to having raped 11 or 12 boys.
 Screengrab from the documentary
Screengrab from the documentary
Doran also questions Imran Khan whose party Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) formed the government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa which has Peshawar as its capital.
"It's one of the most sad and shameful aspects of our society. I am totally embarrassed by this and that we have not really been able to protect them," Khan said.
Disturbing Rotherham child abuse report
The release of the documentary overlaps with the alarming revelations of a report released from Rotherham, the Northern English town where abuse, grooming and trafficking of 1,400 girls by predominantly Asian men over a 16-year period.
According to Reuters, the independent report last week exposed the scale and graphic nature of the crimes and raised difficult questions about whether timidity about confronting the racial aspects of the abuse had prompted authorities to turn a blind eye.
Some of the victims, mainly white girls in social care homes, were as young as 11 and were plied with drugs and alcohol before being trafficked to cities across northern England and gang-raped by groups of men, predominately of Pakistani heritage, the report said.
Those who tried to speak out were threatened with guns and made to watch brutal gang rapes. Their abusers said they would be next if they told anyone. One girl was doused with petrol, her rapist threatening to set her alight.
The report added that senior managers in social care "underplayed" the problem while police regarded many victims with contempt.

CM sides with party lawmaker in make-up test case

PESHAWAR: Instead of holding his party parliamentarian accountable for violation of statuary rules and regulations and collusion to get a degree, the chief minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has sought the removal of the vice-chancellor of University of Peshawar, according to documents and official sources.
In a summary sent to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Governor Sardar Mahtab Ahmad Khan, who is the chancellor of University of Peshawar, Chief Minister Pervez Khattak has recommended removal of Vice-chancellor Dr Rasul Jan.
“This is bizarre,” an official aware of the development said.
“I don’t think this can stand the test of scrutiny,” said another official.

Sends summary to governor for removal of UoP vice-chancellor


The chief minister came up with his recommendations after a two-member inquiry committee, constituted by Chief Secretary Amjad Ali Khan to look into the controversy surrounding the degree issue of PTI MNA Murad Saeed, submitted its report.
The PTI poster-boy from Swat had been embroiled in the controversy when it emerged that he, in collusion with some officials of the University of Peshawar, had manipulated the system to receive BS degree in environmental sciences.
Significantly, the two member committee came up with divergent and contradictory findings. The committee member from higher education department favoured Mr Saeed and held the vice-chancellor responsible for deliberately attempting to deny him a degree.
The member noted that there had been such precedents in the past, though illegal, there was no reason why Mr Saeed was singled out and discriminated against.
The report submitted by a member of the committee from the law department, obtained through the Right to Information Act, held the MNA responsible for misconduct along with the officials of the university who helped him to manipulate the system. The vice-chancellor, after his own inquiry, had also held same officials responsible and had taken action against.
The report submitted by the higher education official, however, could not be obtained. Minister for Higher Education Mushtaq Ghani confirmed that he received a ‘sealed report’ and passed it on to the competent authority.
It is, however, hard to believe since the summary would have had to contain his views before it was sent to the chief minister for approval.
The law department member noted: “ It is clear from inquiry report that there is collusion between ex-student (Murad Saeed) and university authorities to play this game in violation of Statute 1982-08 and Regulations 2010 etc of Peshawar University.”
“Both the university authorities and Murad Saeed are equally responsible for this misconduct.”
“Those responsible in the deal of examination and awarding degree if any, to Murad Saeed (in Peshawar University) may be proceeded in accordance with rules and regulations of the University,” he recommended in his report.
Ironically, instead of taking a balanced view or ordering a higher level inquiry into the sordid affair, Chief Minister Khattak appeared to have chosen to side with his MNA and recommended the removal of the vice-chancellor.
An official told Dawn that the vice-chancellor in a letter to the chief secretary last week complained that he was being pressured and harassed by the high ups to capitulate and change his stance in the case.
It was also revealed that the chief minister had thrice summoned Dr Rasul Jan to his office to ‘request’ him to go soft in Murad Saeed’s case. Mr Ghani had done the same, an official privy to the controversy said.
“I think this was coming. Dr Rasul Jan has been in the eye of the storm for quite some time. He was intransigent, be that the sexual harassment case against a senior faculty member or the case related to Murad Saeed. The powers that be now want him out. Two bigwigs do not see eye to eye with the vice-chancellor,” the official said.
The MNA from Swat has been accused of arranging a hurriedly held make-up test for the papers he missed back in 2009 BS semester examination at department of environmental sciences, University of Peshawar in March 2015.
The report submitted by the member from the law department gives details of the process and rules and regulations, which were violated and also mentions how the MNA could not give satisfactory answers to questions like why he, as a failed student, was required to repeat course, did not follow the specific clause.
As a ‘failed student’, there was no provision in Statutes/Regulations of 1982-83-08 (r/w Regulation of 2010) to appear in make-up test then how and why he took the same. While it was legally required to register himself in the next batch then what stopped him to deposit the prescribed fee, which was mandatory provision, yet he did not, he noted.
“He gave detailed explanation to the above (questions) yet with no satisfaction,” said the report.
The report says that as per his (Murad Saeed) stance, he had passed all his papers, then what prompted him to re-appear and that too in an un-lawful way.
According to the latest inquiry report, Mr Saeed had been the student of Batch-IV (2005-2009). According to Regulations, he was given admission in 2005 ending in 2009 so to successfully complete his requirement or to pass his entire semester, from 2005 to 2013.
He was marked ‘absent’ in three papers of “introduction to environmental sciences” in first semester of-B-IV. Besides, he was found again ‘failed’ in “remote sensing” of sixth semester.
“Murad Saeed, in the eyes of the law so framed, did not complete his course successfully up to 2013, terming himself unqualified to receive BS degree of environmental science from University of Peshawar,” the report pointed out.
The additional secretary law, who was member of the inquiry committee, noted that “Peshawar University should arrange for repeat course for failed student namely Murad Saeed and other (if any) by amending the regulations of the institution.”
His comments make it abundantly clear that Mr Saeed was a failed student and thus did not deserve to be given a degree, a fact contested by the MNA.
Published in Dawn, August 6th, 2015

Hamid criticises PTI’s legal team

Hamid criticises PTI’s legal team


ISLAMABAD: Report of the inquiry commission constituted to investigate allegations that the last general elections had been rigged has not only dealt a blow to credibility of the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) but also exposed fissures within its ranks.
Commenting on the report that rejected all the charges, senior Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf leader and lawyer Hamid Khan has blamed his party’s legal team for the fiasco.
Talking to Dawn on Sunday, he alleged that “the party has been hijacked by the remnants of the (government of) former military ruler Gen Pervez Musharraf”.
He went on to claim that a conspiracy had been hatched to destroy the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf by the “forces of status quo”.
When asked to identify the people who, according to him, were behind the conspiracy, he named Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf general secretary Jahangir Tareen. “Don’t you know that he was a minister during the Musharraf regime?”

“The party has been hijacked by remnants of the (government) of former military ruler Gen Pervez Musharraf”


He alleged that his party’s chairman, Imran Khan, had not been advised properly by his team and it had agreed “on wrong terms of reference” for the inquiry commission.
Hamid Khan, who appeared unhappy with his party’s leadership for not consulting him over matters relating to the commission, said the reference prepared by the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf’s legal team was ”wrong”.
Saying that agents of status quo had joined the party in a large number after October 2011, he vowed to revive the old Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf which comprised “ideological people” who wanted to bring about “real change”.
“We will Insha Allah cleanse the party of people who are damaging it under a conspiracy,” he said.
Meanwhile, the PTI chairman, in his messages on social media, praised senior lawyer Abdul Hafeez Pirzada and his team for their efforts during the proceedings of the commission.
“I want to thank Pirzada’s team, esp Sikandar, for their hard work and passion. I have the greatest respect and admiration for him and the heroic way in which he fought PTI’s case before the judicial commission.
“Thanks also go to our PTI lawyers and volunteers, esp Ishaq Khakwani, for putting in marathon hours of work with unflinching commitment,” he said in Twitter messages.
Hamid Khan was apparently sidelined by the party leadership during the days of its Islamabad sit-in last year when he had submitted an unconditional apology on behalf of Imran Khan in the Supreme Court during the hearing of a contempt of court case against the PTI chief Imran Khan later withdrew the apology.
No Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf office-bearer agreed to offer comments on Hamid Khan’s remarks.
Published in Dawn, July 27th, 2015

Blogroll