Yesterday two irresponsible statements came on record. The first one out
of Garhi Khuda Baksh from an emotional Bilawal Bhutto Zardari who
equated the massive presence of Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf (PTI) to a
non-tsunami only comprising of water in “chaar lotay”. It was Bilawal’s
mother’s death anniversary and also seemed to also mark his debut as an
active politician.
The second statement came out of Karachi from Dr Arif Alvi — the
elected representative for Karachi’s NA-250 — in the form of a campaign
on social media, encouraging residents of Karachi to demolish the wall
surrounding Bilawal House in these words: “Join the movement at Bilawal
Chowrangi on 29th Dec 1pm — come with flags, banners, shovels &
spray paint — let's take this illegal wall down — help spread the
word!”. In a matter of hours, the campaign appeared to gather a lot of
online support.
Here is why both statements are immature and shortsighted. Bilawal,
aiming to enter mainstream politics with rumours of him contesting the
NA-204 by-election, must be humble enough to realiSe that he stands to
benefit from the glory and achievement of two Bhutto generations before
him. If today Bilawal is allowed to take centre stage in Gahri Khuda
Baksh, it is because of the struggle and mass following of Zulfikar Ali
Bhutto and Benazir Bhutto. Bilawal, on his own, is yet to prove his
merit.
On the contrary, PTI is Imran Khan’s brain child and much of what it
is today has a lot to do with its chief’s struggle and perseverance. It
cannot be ignored that in this year’s election Khan rose to give every
major political party a run for its money. And if Bilawal is indeed
serious about politics he stands to learn a lot from PTI and its
achievements rather than dismissing outright that party’s credentials.
Now coming to PTI, Dr Alvi’s
campaign against the wall surrounding Bilawal House
is devoid of political maturity as it doesn’t seem that it’s being done
in the name of justice but more so as a hasty and emotional response to
Bilawal’s banter. Secondly, given that PTI has had a dismal performance
in the Clifton Area of Karachi (UC-38), this could also be construed as
a political maneuver to mobilise popular support before the local body
elections scheduled for Jan 18, 2014.
It cannot be denied that on Sept 4, 2013, the Sindh High Court on a
case relating to blockades installed near Bilawal House and in other
parts of Karachi
directed the authorities
to ensure that freedom of movement of citizens as guaranteed under the
law be ensured. Also, it is true that the wall surrounding Bilawal House
still stands appearing no less than a slap in the face of the common
citizen as it displays disgraceful violation of laws by the rich and
mighty. When I contested the election in May, I too had included the
removal of illegal blockades around Bilawal House and other
establishments as part of my manifesto. The people in the Bilawal House
neighbourhood have only suffered from the wall as it occupies a service
lane, a three lane main road and poses regular traffic disruptions.
However, it is not befitting to elected representatives like Dr Alvi
to encourage people to pour into the streets, take the law in their own
hands and bring down walls under the garb of justice when in fact they
may very well be motivated by political animosity. It is even more
unbecoming when Dr Alvi is aware of the illegal construction of a dental
hospital, a commercial establishment in the residential area of Block
4, Clifton, only a few kilometres away from the Bilawal House wall.
According to the
Clifton Block 4 Residents Association,
the hospital is a project undertaken by a member of his immediate
family. The residents of Block 4 have complained to Dr Alvi regarding
the illegal construction on more than one occasion and the same have
been ignored. The structure is almost complete and its design and
architecture is testament to it being constructed for commercial use in
violation of the by-laws of the residential area.
Both Bilawal House and the under-construction dental hospital fall
under NA-250. The MPA from that area, PS-112, is also a member of the
PTI which makes me curious as to whether that party’s representatives in
the country’s legislatures differentiate between illegal construction
by members of opposing parties and that done by its own. If they don’t
and if they indeed strive for justice as the name of the party suggests,
then they should first put their own house in order.
In view of this, I would expect Dr Alvi to call off the campaign that
asks civilians to illegally demolish the wall especially when the same
can cause clashes. However, if they have the right intentions and they
must stress on a protest then I would like to advise them to gather
people outside Bilawal House. In fact, gather them in thousands but
without taking the law into their own hands and member of the protest
may even sign affidavits which would be attached to a plea to initiate
contempt of court proceedings against the authorities that did not carry
out the Sept 4 directives of the SHC.
A political party that speaks of tabdeeli (change) is expected to
make its supporters more aware of their rights and obligations rather
than encourage them towards anarchy and menace. At least, that is the
tabdeeli I expect from the ‘educated’ brand of politicians.